Dog sperm study could hold the answer to drop in human fertility
Over the past three decades, sperm quality in dogs has rapidly fallen. This has been found by researchers in a study which could explain the purported decline in human fertility.
Their findings highlighted a potential link between fertility and environmental contaminants, after the scientists discovered chemicals which had a detrimental effect on sperm function in some commercially available pet foods.
Researchers at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom believe that the study could help explain the reported significant decline in human semen quality.
“This is the first time that such a decline in male fertility has been reported in the dog and we believe this is due to environmental contaminants, some of which we have detected in dog food and in the sperm and testes of the animals themselves,” said Dr. Richard Lea, reader in reproductive biology at the university’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, who led the research.
”While further research is needed to conclusively demonstrate a link, the dog may indeed be a sentinel for humans – it shares the same environment, exhibits the same range of diseases, many with the same frequency, and responds in a similar way to therapies,“ he added.
Dr. Lea and his team collected semen from between 42 and 97 stud dogs every year over 26 years at an assistance dogs breeding center. Semen samples were then analyzed to assess the percentage of sperm that appeared normal and had the expected pattern of motility.
Sperm motility declined by 2.5% per year between 1988 and 1998, and then at a rate of 1.2% per year from 2002 to 2014.
It was also found that male pups fathered by the stud dogs with declining semen quality were more prone to cryptorchidism, a condition in which the testes fail to correctly descend into the scrotum.
According to Dr. Lea, genetic conditions were not to blame because the research was carried out over a relatively short period of time. He said that the study “begs the question” whether a similar effect could be observed in human male fertility.
The purported decline in male fertility is a controversial subject in science with many criticizing the variability of data in the studies.
However, Dr. Lea said that the University of Nottingham study provided a “unique set of reliable data from a controlled population“ which was not affected by factors – such as in laboratory methods, training of laboratory personnel or improved quality control over the years – which could have caused variations to the results.
